Having scrambled through a NDK documentation and a lot of hit and trials and experimentation, finally I could figure out how could one build (even though partially) Open Source libraries with Android NDK.
Some background on how Autotools work:
The way autootool and friends work is this:
You write a configure.ac file, which is read in by Autoreconf and generates a configure script. Configure script test the build system for headers, libraries etc. and generates a config.h which contains definitions like #define HAVE_XXX 1 and also generates Makefiles after reading in the Makefile.in files which in turn is generated using Automake by reading in Makefile.am.
configure.ac —> input to –> autoreconf –> generates -> configure script –> checks host system for headers, libraries etc. -> generates -> config.hAlso
Makefile.am –> input to automake –> generates –> Makefile.in –> input to –> configure script –> generates MakefileThe code uses the generated config.h in the following fashion:
#ifdef HAVE_XXXX #include#else Provide some other mechanism or report error to user or do whatever you want #endif
The problem?
Most Open Source libraries use GNU autotools and its friends for building.
The first problem is that the Autools generate some configuration headers based on build time probe of the system. By build time probe I mean checking for things like if a header, library or a tool is present or not. In cross compiling scenario some of these probe should be done on the target system and not on the build system.
Second, the build system for most cross compiler tools have their own quirks which need passing some extra flags.
Third, in case of Android, it provides its own build system which are essentially some Makefile definitions and rules. This is provided so that people can build their code easily without having to deal with usual cross compiling issues. Thus there is a gap that while your autotools would generate the Makefiles while Android build system requires its own styled Makefiles in the form of Android.mk. One cannot simply generate Android.mk files using autotools.
Fourth, even if one gets to write Android specific Makefiles, the build would most probably fail as during the build it would look for a file config.h included in the fashion shown below, while no such file would exist as it is generated by the configure script.
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H #include “config.h” #endifSimply copying a config.h file from a run of configure script on another build system wouldn’t really work as the header files and other libraries present on Android may not match with the header and libraries present on the build system. Thus config.h would probably differ if it is somehow generated for Android with the one generated on a build system.
So how does one build an open source library for Android?
Solution:
The way I have managed to work around this trouble is to run the configure script with right cross compilation variables so that a config.h matching my Android system gets built and then writing Android.mk files which would simply use the Android build system.
The way I figured out the right flags was by building the Android source tree which displayed what flags are being used for building and then taking the cues from there, I passed the right flags to the configure script.
It looks something like this for building Android-3 target API on a linux host:
export ANDROID_ROOT=/home/divkis01/mydroid
The command above is sets the path where the Android sources are checked out from git respository.
NOTE: It is not necessary to check out the ANDROID sources and you can replace the ANDROID_ROOT with NDK_ROOT in all the commands below, along with proper path to the NDK cross compiler.
The command above is necessary so that configure can find out the path to the cross compiler which is needed to build some test programs during the configure run process. Please note that you can also set the path to the NDK compiler root
The command above has several points that should be well understood.
–host=arm-eabi –> This tells the configure script if the cross compilation is being done or not. It is also used as a prefix to some of the cross compiler tools like strip, nm etc.
CC=arm-eabi-gcc –> This tells the compiler that should be used for building
CPPFLAGS –> This tells the location where the header files should be searched which were specified in configure.ac with AC_CHECK_HEADER macro
CFLAGS=”-nostdlib” passes the option to build some test programs during configure process run. If you don’t pass this the compiler would link the standard C library of the host system which wouldn’t be compatible with the C library of the target system. You will end up getting error something like this, if you don’t pass this option:
/home/divkis01/mydroid/prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/arm-eabi-4.2.1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-eabi/4.2.1/../../../../arm-eabi/bin/ld: crt0.o: No such file: No such file or directoryLIBS=”-lc” –> This option tells that it should explicitly link to a library called libc.so which is present in the location specified using the -L in the LDFLAGS option. If you are wondering that usually to build a C executable one doesn’t need to provide -lc as libc is automatically linked, then why do we need to specify this here? The answer lies in -nostdlib flag, which instructs not to link with the standard C library on the build system.
You will end up getting error something like this, if you don’t pass this option:
/home/divkis01/mydroid/prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/arm-eabi-4.2.1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-eabi/4.2.1/../../../../arm-eabi/bin/ld: crt0.o: No such file: No such file or directorycollect2: ld returned 1 exit status
LDFLAGS = –> This option is also passed to build some test programs during configure process run.If you don’t pass the -Wl,-rpath-link option, then linker does not know where do the libraries dependent on the library specific using LIBS reside. If you don’t pass the -L option then the linker doesn’t know where do the libraries specified in LIBS reside.
You will end up getting error something like this, if you don’t pass the -Wl,-rpath-link option:
/home/divkis01/mydroid/prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/arm-eabi-4.2.1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-eabi/4.2.1/../../../../arm-eabi/bin/ld: warning: libdl.so, needed by /home/divkis01/mydroid/development/ndk/build/platforms/android-3/arch-arm/usr/lib//libc.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)/home/divkis01/mydroid/prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/arm-eabi-4.2.1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-eabi/4.2.1/../../../../arm-eabi/bin/ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 00008184
/home/divkis01/mydroid/development/ndk/build/platforms/android-3/arch-arm/usr/lib//libc.so: undefined reference to `dl_unwind_find_exidx’
You will end up getting error something like this, if you don’t pass the -L option:
/home/divkis01/mydroid/prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/arm-eabi-4.2.1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-eabi/4.2.1/../../../../arm- eabi/bin/ld: cannot find -lc collect2: ld returned 1 exit statusOnce you run the configure script with these flags and options, it will generate the appropriate config.h which is compatible / in sync with your target system. Now you can go ahead and start writing the Android.mk files to build your sources.
Other troubles:
This solves only part of the problem as Autotools not only help in building but also in installing. Given it doesn’t make sense to install the build for a target system on host except for the headers. This can be done by augmenting the Android.mk files or writing some shell scripts to do this manually.
Conclusion:
Autotool is good only on GNU systems and using it for cross compiling can be really tedious, confusing, error prone or even impossible. The method described here is a hack and should be used at your own risk.
Let me know if this post was helpful for you.
0 comments:
Post a Comment